|
Post by P1kachu on May 23, 2015 12:43:14 GMT
I will continuity, Tnp knows what is "continuity" ofc are you kidding me?! TNP know what is Rayo's Number ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) False... *searches google* True! TNP knows HTF ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
|
|
|
Post by 《§》carbonara <3〖ƧƐ〗 on May 23, 2015 12:57:30 GMT
ofc are you kidding me?! TNP know what is Rayo's Number ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) False... *searches google* True! TNP knows HTF ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Happy Tree Friends? lel ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) TNP can give an algebric definition of Rayo's number ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 23, 2015 15:13:46 GMT
I think you can make sense of this: &forall R {
{for any (coded) formula [ψ] and any variable assignment t
(R( [ψ],t) ↔
( ([ψ] = `x_i ∈ x_j' ∧ t(x_1) ∈ t(x_j)) ∨
([ψ] = `x_i = x_j' ∧ t(x_1) = t(x_j)) ∨
([ψ] = `(∼θ)' ∧ ∼R([θ],t)) ∨
([ψ] = `(θ∧ξ)' ∧ R([θ],t) ∧ R([ξ],t)) ∨
([ψ] = `∃x_i (&theta)' and, for some an xi-variant t' of t, R([θ],t'))
)} →
R([φ],s)}
Tnp will write out Googolmilliplex ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
|
|
|
Post by 《§》carbonara <3〖ƧƐ〗 on May 24, 2015 13:39:38 GMT
I think you can make sense of this: &forall R { {for any (coded) formula [ψ] and any variable assignment t (R( [ψ],t) ↔ ( ([ψ] = `x_i ∈ x_j' ∧ t(x_1) ∈ t(x_j)) ∨ ([ψ] = `x_i = x_j' ∧ t(x_1) = t(x_j)) ∨ ([ψ] = `(∼θ)' ∧ ∼R([θ],t)) ∨ ([ψ] = `(θ∧ξ)' ∧ R([θ],t) ∧ R([ξ],t)) ∨ ([ψ] = `∃x_i (&theta)' and, for some an xi-variant t' of t, R([θ],t')) )} → R([φ],s)} Tnp will write out Googolmilliplex ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) Your definition is the def of Sat([ψ],s) wich is indeed related to Rayo's number, kden I smell copypasta False, its impossibruh Tnp loves cheese <3
|
|
|
Post by P1kachu on May 24, 2015 13:41:42 GMT
True dat ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Tnp loves cheese <3
|
|
|
Post by geodashinertiaa on Jun 12, 2015 0:27:27 GMT
True. The next person will not answer this question true.
|
|
|
Post by P1kachu on Jun 12, 2015 3:08:55 GMT
Of course not m69 ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Tnp will negate this question ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
|
|